# Go directly from a decision to ANOTHER user flow not possible?

**URL:** https://community.triggre.com/t/go-directly-from-a-decision-to-another-user-flow-not-possible/110
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [May 1, 2020, 10:31am UTC](https://community.triggre.com/t/go-directly-from-a-decision-to-another-user-flow-not-possible/110 "2020-05-01T10:31:00Z")
**Posts on this page:** 3
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Unknown](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/community.triggre.com/unknown/32/31_2.png) [@Unknown](https://community.triggre.com/u/Unknown)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2020, 10:31am UTC](https://community.triggre.com/t/go-directly-from-a-decision-to-another-user-flow-not-possible/110/1 "2020-05-01T10:31:00Z")

</div>

I have a _user flow A_ and a decision in that user flow. If the decision gives me _TRUE_ , I would like to continue immediately in _user flow B_ .

Somehow, I can only get this done by first adding a _Page_ in _user flow A_ , and then connect to _user flow B_ .

Am I missing something or is it a policy of Triggre?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Triggre](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/community.triggre.com/triggre/32/14_2.png) [@Triggre](https://community.triggre.com/u/Triggre)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2020, 10:32am UTC](https://community.triggre.com/t/go-directly-from-a-decision-to-another-user-flow-not-possible/110/2 "2020-05-01T10:32:08Z")

</div>

Hi,

Yes, that is a limitation of Triggre. At the moment we have to build a page before we can go to anther page in another user flow.

This is on our roadmap, so it should be available in a future release.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Unknown](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex035/user_avatar/community.triggre.com/unknown/32/31_2.png) [@Unknown](https://community.triggre.com/u/Unknown)
#### Post date: [May 1, 2020, 10:32am UTC](https://community.triggre.com/t/go-directly-from-a-decision-to-another-user-flow-not-possible/110/3 "2020-05-01T10:32:20Z")

</div>

Since I now know this limitation, I don’t have to look further. Thanks.
